BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS vs COOKED BRATWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 5
vs
COOKED BRATWURST: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | COOKED BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 295 cal | 348 cal | |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 3.9 g | 3.0 g | |
| Fat | 26.9 g | 30.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | COOKED BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | COOKED BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 30 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,128 MG | 833 MG |