BONELESS TILAPIA FILLET vs COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS TILAPIA FILLET: 1
vs
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS TILAPIA FILLET | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 99 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS TILAPIA FILLET | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS TILAPIA FILLET | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 31 MG | 224 MG |