BONELESS SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS vs MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS: 3
vs
MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 65 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 267 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 177 MG | 121 MG |