BONELESS FILLET vs THICK CUT CRISPY BATTERED 100% ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS FILLET wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS FILLET: 7
vs
THICK CUT CRISPY BATTERED 100% ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS FILLET | THICK CUT CRISPY BATTERED 100% ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 8.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 9.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS FILLET | THICK CUT CRISPY BATTERED 100% ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS FILLET | THICK CUT CRISPY BATTERED 100% ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 131 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,018 MG | 560 MG |