BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 484 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 45.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUEBERRY MAPLE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 1,097 MG |