BLUE SANDING SUGAR vs MACADAMIA NUT TOPPING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACADAMIA NUT TOPPING wins in 3 out of 9 nutrient categories
BLUE SANDING SUGAR: 2
vs
MACADAMIA NUT TOPPING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE SANDING SUGAR | MACADAMIA NUT TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE SANDING SUGAR | MACADAMIA NUT TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 286 MG |