BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 117.9 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 18 MG | 50 MG |