BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI RINGS vs SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI RINGS: 0
vs
SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI RINGS | SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 82.1 g | 79.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI RINGS | SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI RINGS | SNOWFLAKE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |