BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI CANDY vs MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI CANDY: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI CANDY | MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 378 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 2.2 g | |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 68.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 11.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE RASPBERRY GUMMI CANDY | MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 113 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 44 MG |