BLUE DECORATING ICING vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLUE DECORATING ICING wins in 2 out of 7 nutrient categories
BLUE DECORATING ICING: 2
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE DECORATING ICING | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 417 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 20.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE DECORATING ICING | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 104 MG |