BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK vs WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 9.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 16.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 283 MG | 434 MG |