BLACK FOREST HAM vs BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK FOREST HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST HAM: 5
vs
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST HAM | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 107 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST HAM | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST HAM | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 696 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 1,429 MG |