BLACK FOREST HAM vs SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM wins in 3 out of 8 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST HAM: 2
vs
SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST HAM | SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST HAM | SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,196 MG |