BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 325 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 76.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK AUSTRALIAN LICORICE | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 83 MG |