BISCUITERIE ALMOND THINS vs RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
BISCUITERIE ALMOND THINS: 3
vs
RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BISCUITERIE ALMOND THINS | RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 72.4 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BISCUITERIE ALMOND THINS | RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 5.7 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BISCUITERIE ALMOND THINS | RICH CLASSIC CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 397 MG | 893 MG |