BELTS CANDY vs MINI MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MINI MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BELTS CANDY: 0
vs
MINI MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BELTS CANDY | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 80 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BELTS CANDY | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BELTS CANDY | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 50 MG | Tie |