BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs FILO WRAPPED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 4
vs
FILO WRAPPED SHRIMP: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | FILO WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 225 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 14.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | FILO WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | FILO WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 176 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 343 MG | 0 MG |