BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 23.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 98 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 755 MG | 341 MG |