BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO vs Pork Ham Shank Bone In
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO: 5
vs
Pork Ham Shank Bone In: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO | Pork Ham Shank Bone In | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO | Pork Ham Shank Bone In | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF TENDERLOIN CH PSMO | Pork Ham Shank Bone In | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 286 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 134 MG |