BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ vs Pork Hocks Split
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ: 3
vs
Pork Hocks Split: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Pork Hocks Split | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 219 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Pork Hocks Split | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Pork Hocks Split | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 0 MG |