BEEF KISHKA vs 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
BEEF KISHKA: 4
vs
50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF KISHKA | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 cal | 240 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF KISHKA | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF KISHKA | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 155 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 948 MG | 1,020 MG |