BEEF HOT LINKS vs NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF HOT LINKS: 2
vs
NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF HOT LINKS | NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 316 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 1.1 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 24.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF HOT LINKS | NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF HOT LINKS | NATURAL CASING CHEDDAR BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 26 MG | 66 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 947 MG | 945 MG |