BEEF HANGING TENDERS vs Pork Back Rib 2.5 down
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF HANGING TENDERS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF HANGING TENDERS: 6
vs
Pork Back Rib 2.5 down: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.5 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 152 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 22.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.5 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.5 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 348 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 62 MG |