BEEF FRANKS vs UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 306 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 4.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 26.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED TURKEY HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 980 MG | 643 MG |