BEEF FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 306 cal | 301 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 11.5 g | |
| Carbs | 4.1 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 26.5 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 980 MG | 920 MG |