BEEF FRANKS vs TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 27.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,225 MG | 786 MG |