BEEF FRANKS vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 312 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 14.6 g | 18.9 g | |
| Carbs | 4.2 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 25 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 22 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 979 MG | 711 MG |