BEEF FRANKS vs RED HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
RED HOT LINKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 306 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2.0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 163 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 939 MG | 714 MG |