BEEF FRANKS vs FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 307 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 28 g | 9.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | FULLY COOKED BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 973 MG | 1,345 MG |