BEEF FRANKS vs SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 5
vs
SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 274 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 25 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 696 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,024 MG | 946 MG |