BEEF FRANKS vs MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 13.0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.7 g | |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 29.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 74 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 964 MG | 815 MG |