BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs SKINLESS FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS FRANKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
SKINLESS FRANKS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | SKINLESS FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | SKINLESS FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | SKINLESS FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 786 MG |