BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs CLASSICO GENOA SALAMI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
CLASSICO GENOA SALAMI: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CLASSICO GENOA SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 33.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CLASSICO GENOA SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CLASSICO GENOA SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,143 MG | 1,625 MG |