BEEF BOLOGNA vs UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BOLOGNA: 1
vs
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BOLOGNA | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 344 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 28.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BOLOGNA | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 188 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,094 MG | 786 MG |