BEEF BOLOGNA vs SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF BOLOGNA: 3
vs
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 109 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 356 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 964 MG | 800 MG |