BAY SCALLOPS vs TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BAY SCALLOPS: 2
vs
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BAY SCALLOPS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 96 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BAY SCALLOPS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BAY SCALLOPS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 142 MG | 224 MG |