BATTERED WHOLE GREEN BEANS vs BEEF TAMALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF TAMALE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BATTERED WHOLE GREEN BEANS: 2
vs
BEEF TAMALE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED WHOLE GREEN BEANS | BEEF TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 177 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 6.2 g | |
| Carbs | 22.4 g | 19.5 g | |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 8.0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED WHOLE GREEN BEANS | BEEF TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED WHOLE GREEN BEANS | BEEF TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 882 MG | 646 MG |