BALSAMIC FIG DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BALSAMIC FIG DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BALSAMIC FIG DRESSING: 5
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BALSAMIC FIG DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 552 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 26.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BALSAMIC FIG DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 83 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 724 MG |