BALL PARK vs CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BALL PARK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BALL PARK: 5
vs
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BALL PARK | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 160 cal | 487 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 18.4 g | |
| Carbs | 4 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 42.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BALL PARK | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BALL PARK | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 720 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 960 MG | 1,316 MG |