BAKING POWDER vs NATURAL TAMARIND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BAKING POWDER wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BAKING POWDER: 4
vs
NATURAL TAMARIND: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BAKING POWDER | NATURAL TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BAKING POWDER | NATURAL TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BAKING POWDER | NATURAL TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 4,833 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 8,333 MG | 0 MG |