BAKED ONION RINGS vs ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
BAKED ONION RINGS: 0
vs
ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BAKED ONION RINGS | ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 289 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 29.0 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BAKED ONION RINGS | ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 9.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BAKED ONION RINGS | ORIGINAL BEEF STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 1,316 MG |