BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET vs FULLY COOKED ROAST HALF DUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET: 5
vs
FULLY COOKED ROAST HALF DUCK: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | FULLY COOKED ROAST HALF DUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fat | 12.0 g | 13.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | FULLY COOKED ROAST HALF DUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | FULLY COOKED ROAST HALF DUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 317 MG | 457 MG |