BACON WRAPPED BEEF TENDERLOIN vs ORIGINAL BONELESS CHICKEN BITES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED BEEF TENDERLOIN: 4
vs
ORIGINAL BONELESS CHICKEN BITES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED BEEF TENDERLOIN | ORIGINAL BONELESS CHICKEN BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 13.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED BEEF TENDERLOIN | ORIGINAL BONELESS CHICKEN BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED BEEF TENDERLOIN | ORIGINAL BONELESS CHICKEN BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 188 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 482 MG | 1,012 MG |