BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET: 4
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 585 MG | 67 MG |