BACON RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 2 out of 7 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 433 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 867 MG |