BACON RANCH DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 367 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 57 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 117 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 700 MG |