BACON RANCH DRESSING vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
MCCORMICK: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 462 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 7.7 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 731 MG |