BACON RANCH DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 393 MG |