BACON MAPLE VIRGINIA PEANUTS vs CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON MAPLE VIRGINIA PEANUTS: 2
vs
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON MAPLE VIRGINIA PEANUTS | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 385 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.9 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 69.2 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 11.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON MAPLE VIRGINIA PEANUTS | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON MAPLE VIRGINIA PEANUTS | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 77 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 0 MG |