BACON CAESAR DRESSING vs CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON CAESAR DRESSING: 5
vs
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 56.7 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 733 MG |